OKR 1.0 vs. OKR 2.0 - What Sets Them Apart?

In this article, we will explore the shift from OKR 1.0 to OKR 2.0, examining the fundamental distinctions that characterize these two versions.

2 min read
In the dynamic realm of goal-setting methodologies, Objectives and Key Results (OKR) have become synonymous with driving organizational performance and focus. As businesses evolve, so do their management frameworks.

Understanding OKR 1.0:

OKR 1.0, or the first version of Objectives and Key Results, emerged as a management framework pioneered by Andy Grove at Intel and later popularized by John Doerr in his influential book "Measure What Matters." The foundational principles of OKR 1.0 include:

1. Clear Objectives:   Defined and ambitious statements that articulate what an organization aims to achieve within a specific timeframe.

2. Key Results:  Measurable outcomes that quantitatively track progress toward the achievement of objectives. Key Results serve as the concrete indicators of success.

3. Cascade Structure: OKR 1.0 typically follows a cascading structure, where organizational objectives trickle down to teams and individuals. The alignment ensures that everyone's efforts contribute to overarching goals.

4. Quarterly Cadence:  Regular quarterly cycles of setting, reviewing, and recalibrating OKRs to maintain agility and adaptability in a fast-paced business environment.

Introducing OKR 2.0:

As organizations evolved and faced new challenges, a more refined version of OKR emerged – OKR 2.0. This iteration builds upon the foundational principles of OKR 1.0, introducing several enhancements to foster even greater effectiveness:

1. Continuous Performance Management: OKR 2.0 emphasizes a shift from annual or quarterly performance reviews to continuous performance management. This allows for more frequent check-ins and feedback, promoting agility and real-time adjustments.

2. Focus on Impact: While OKR 1.0 emphasized measurable outcomes, OKR 2.0 places a heightened focus on the impact of these outcomes. It encourages organizations to delve deeper into the qualitative aspects of success and the broader implications of achieving key results.

3. Increased Flexibility: OKR 2.0 embraces flexibility in goal-setting. Rather than a strict adherence to a quarterly cadence, organizations adopting OKR 2.0 may set goals for varying timeframes, adapting to the unique needs and rhythms of different teams or projects.

4. Incorporating Employee Feedback: OKR 2.0 places a stronger emphasis on incorporating feedback from employees at all levels. By engaging teams in the goal-setting process and considering their insights, organizations can enhance alignment and foster a sense of ownership.

5. Integration with Employee Development: OKR 2.0 recognizes the interconnectedness of performance management and employee development. It aligns individual OKRs with professional development goals, promoting a holistic approach to employee growth.


In the ever-evolving landscape of organizational management, the transition from OKR 1.0 to OKR 2.0 represents a natural progression toward more nuanced and people-centric practices. While both versions share the core principles of clarity, measurement, and alignment, OKR 2.0 introduces refinements that resonate with the evolving needs of modern businesses. As organizations embark on their OKR journey, understanding these differences is key to leveraging the full potential of this powerful goal-setting methodology.

© Figg Africa 2022. All right reserved